![]() |
|
The FREE Second Opinion and Tax Recovery Specialists |
Get Started Now!Interested? Click above to get started now and have your tax returns reviewed by Taxback for FREE! FREE Revealing Report
"Why You Should NEVER, EVER Let the Opinion of Only One Tax
Professional Determine Your Tax Liability." * Your personal information will not be rented, traded or sold to anyone. Your complete confidentiality is assured. We respect your privacy and hate junk email with a passion. |
GAO Report: Some professional tax preparers
aren’t up to the job
|
Not enough information. Some tax preparers fail to ask questions about clients' personal circumstances, leading to overpayment of taxes.
An earlier GAO study found that 2 million taxpayers
who used a preparer took the standard deduction when they would have been
better off itemizing their deductions.
Itemizing requires more effort than taking the standard deduction, but
that's what you're paying a tax preparer to do.
If your tax preparer doesn't determine up front whether you have enough
deductions to itemize, you're not getting your money's worth.
Overlooked or overestimated tax credits. A report by the Treasury Department's inspector general estimated that 230,000 returns filed by preparers in 2001 failed to claim the child tax credit for eligible taxpayers. For 2002, that credit is worth $600 per child.
Similarly, an IRS study of tax returns that claimed
the earned income tax credit in 1999 found taxpayers claimed $11 billion in
credits for which they weren't eligible.
The study also found that eligible taxpayers failed to claim $710 million in
credits. More than 65% of returns that claimed the earned income tax credit
were filed by paid preparers.
Math errors. In 2000, the IRS caught and corrected 357,000 computational errors on returns filed by paid preparers.
That's a tiny percentage of total returns filed by paid preparers, the GAO says.
Questionable advice. In one case, a preparer advised a married couple with two children to file two tax returns claiming head of household status, enabling each to claim the earned income tax credit. When the IRS discovered the scheme, it hit the couple with a bill for more than $4,000.
Fraud. One preparer, who was later sentenced to prison, altered clients' returns, adding fraudulent dependents. As compensation, he kept a portion of his clients' refunds.
Inflated fees. GAO employees, posing as potential clients, discovered a huge variation in the cost of tax preparation.
Some preparers offered to file electronic returns
at no charge, while one preparer said he charged $210 to $250 to e-file.
Others charged for unnecessary services, or charged exorbitant interest
rates for refund-anticipation loans, a loan against an expected refund.
One preparer told the GAO he would charge $174 for an advance on a $700
refund, an annual interest rate of more than 900%.
Vetting A Preparer
By Sandra Block
USA Today (March 31, 2003)
<<< Back to Tax
Articles